Original article
“Engineers 3D print sturdy glass bricks for building structures” — Jennifer Chu, MIT News, September 20, 2024.
Original article: https://news.mit.edu/2024/engineers-3d-print-sturdy-glass-bricks-building-structures-0920
Access checked: October 29, 2026 (UTC+8). Free to read without payment or login. This is a selected older article, not news published today. The complete original English article appears at the end of this page; the learning exercises are original.
Reading plan
Suggested level: B2–C1 (editorial estimate, not an official IELTS rating). Time: 12–15 minutes to read, plus 8 minutes for the questions.
Introduction
如果建筑材料能像积木一样拆开、重组,一栋建筑拆除后,材料是否还能拥有下一次生命?今天的文章介绍可互锁的 3D 打印玻璃砖。阅读时重点区分三件事:循环建造的目标、实验已经证明的结果,以及研究者尚未实现的下一步计划。文中的 “today” 指原文发表日,而不是本次选读日期。
Vocabulary
- reconfigurable — 可重新配置、重新组合的。
- masonry — 砌体;砖石结构。
- embodied carbon — 隐含碳;本文指建筑从材料制造到拆除等过程相关的温室气体排放。
- interlock — 互相扣合。
- withstand — 承受;经受住。
- molten — 熔融的。
- contaminated — 受污染的。
- fracture — 断裂;破裂。
Reading comprehension
Answer questions 1–3 briefly in English. For questions 4–5, choose TRUE, FALSE, or NOT GIVEN. These are original practice questions, not official IELTS questions.
1. What does circular construction aim to minimize by reusing and repurposing materials?
Reference answer
2. What two features of the printed bricks help them interlock and form curved walls?
Reference answer
3. What equipment did the researchers use to test the bricks’ mechanical strength?
Reference answer
4. The strongest bricks had an interlocking feature manufactured separately and attached to their bottom.
Reference answer
5. The article gives the total cost of building the researchers’ curved demonstration wall.
Reference answer
Reading strategy
留意 found / tested / constructed 与 envision / aim / could 的差别:前者报告已经完成的实验或示范,后者表达设想或目标。承压测试结果不能直接改写成“所有建筑都已经可以使用这种砖”。第 5 题中,“没有提供造价”不等于“造价很低”。
Expression practice
以下例句均为自拟,并非原文引文。
be comparable to — 与……相当;可与……比较。
Example: The new sample’s strength is comparable to that of the standard material.
scale up — 扩大规模。
Example: The team needs more tests before it can scale up production.
Review
用两句英文分别写一个实验结果和一个未来目标,用 however 连接,并避免把可能性写成既成事实。
Full English article
以下为完整英文正文,与以上本站教学内容分开。依据 MIT News 网页转载政策转载,仅调整网页排版,未改写正文;不转载图片或视频。此政策的文章转载条款与图片的 Creative Commons 许可不同。
Engineers 3D print sturdy glass bricks for building structures
The interlocking bricks, which can be repurposed many times over, can withstand similar pressures as their concrete counterparts.
Jennifer Chu | MIT News
September 20, 2024
What if construction materials could be put together and taken apart as easily as Lego bricks? Such reconfigurable masonry would be disassembled at the end of a building’s lifetime and reassembled into a new structure, in a sustainable cycle that could supply generations of buildings using the same physical building blocks.
That’s the idea behind circular construction, which aims to reuse and repurpose a building’s materials whenever possible, to minimize the manufacturing of new materials and reduce the construction industry’s “embodied carbon,” which refers to the greenhouse gas emissions associated with every process throughout a building’s construction, from manufacturing to demolition.
Now MIT engineers, motivated by circular construction’s eco potential, are developing a new kind of reconfigurable masonry made from 3D-printed, recycled glass. Using a custom 3D glass printing technology provided by MIT spinoff Evenline, the team has made strong, multilayered glass bricks, each in the shape of a figure eight, that are designed to interlock, much like Lego bricks.
In mechanical testing, a single glass brick withstood pressures similar to that of a concrete block. As a structural demonstration, the researchers constructed a wall of interlocking glass bricks. They envision that 3D-printable glass masonry could be reused many times over as recyclable bricks for building facades and internal walls.
“Glass is a highly recyclable material,” says Kaitlyn Becker, assistant professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. “We’re taking glass and turning it into masonry that, at the end of a structure’s life, can be disassembled and reassembled into a new structure, or can be stuck back into the printer and turned into a completely different shape. All this builds into our idea of a sustainable, circular building material.”
“Glass as a structural material kind of breaks people’s brains a little bit,” says Michael Stern, a former MIT graduate student and researcher in both MIT’s Media Lab and Lincoln Laboratory, who is also founder and director of Evenline. “We’re showing this is an opportunity to push the limits of what’s been done in architecture.”
Becker and Stern, with their colleagues, detail their glass brick design in a study appearing today in the journal Glass Structures and Engineering. Their MIT co-authors include lead author Daniel Massimino and Charlotte Folinus, along with Ethan Townsend at Evenline.
Lock step
The inspiration for the new circular masonry design arose partly in MIT’s Glass Lab, where Becker and Stern, then undergraduate students, first learned the art and science of blowing glass.
“I found the material fascinating,” says Stern, who later designed a 3D printer capable of printing molten recycled glass — a project he took on while studying in the mechanical engineering department. “I started thinking of how glass printing can find its place and do interesting things, construction being one possible route.”
Meanwhile, Becker, who accepted a faculty position at MIT, began exploring the intersection of manufacturing and design, and ways to develop new processes that enable innovative designs.
“I get excited about expanding design and manufacturing spaces for challenging materials with interesting characteristics, like glass and its optical properties and recyclability,” Becker says. “As long as it’s not contaminated, you can recycle glass almost infinitely.”
She and Stern teamed up to see whether and how 3D-printable glass could be made into a structural masonry unit as sturdy and stackable as traditional bricks. For their new study, the team used the Glass 3D Printer 3 (G3DP3), the latest version of Evenline’s glass printer, which pairs with a furnace to melt crushed glass bottles into a molten, printable form that the printer then deposits in layered patterns.
The team printed prototype glass bricks using soda-lime glass that is typically used in a glassblowing studio. They incorporated two round pegs onto each printed brick, similar to the studs on a Lego brick. Like the toy blocks, the pegs enable bricks to interlock and assemble into larger structures. Another material placed between the bricks prevent scratches or cracks between glass surfaces but can be removed if a brick structure were to be dismantled and recycled, also allowing bricks to be remelted in the printer and formed into new shapes. The team decided to make the blocks into a figure-eight shape.
“With the figure-eight shape, we can constrain the bricks while also assembling them into walls that have some curvature,” Massimino says.
Stepping stones
The team printed glass bricks and tested their mechanical strength in an industrial hydraulic press that squeezed the bricks until they began to fracture. The researchers found that the strongest bricks were able to hold up to pressures that are comparable to what concrete blocks can withstand. Those strongest bricks were made mostly from printed glass, with a separately manufactured interlocking feature that attached to the bottom of the brick. These results suggest that most of a masonry brick could be made from printed glass, with an interlocking feature that could be printed, cast, or separately manufactured from a different material.
“Glass is a complicated material to work with,” Becker says. “The interlocking elements, made from a different material, showed the most promise at this stage.”
The group is looking into whether more of a brick’s interlocking feature could be made from printed glass, but doesn’t see this as a dealbreaker in moving forward to scale up the design. To demonstrate glass masonry’s potential, they constructed a curved wall of interlocking glass bricks. Next, they aim to build progressively bigger, self-supporting glass structures.
“We have more understanding of what the material’s limits are, and how to scale,” Stern says. “We’re thinking of stepping stones to buildings, and want to start with something like a pavilion — a temporary structure that humans can interact with, and that you could then reconfigure into a second design. And you could imagine that these blocks could go through a lot of lives.”
This research was supported, in part, by the Bose Research Grant Program and MIT’s Research Support Committee.